You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Talc and asbestos exposure. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed settlement for talc would make payments of $400 million to US state AGs. Talc And Asbestos Exposure .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has set the amount of $400 million for resolving U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of its larger $8.9 billion plan to settle claims that its Baby Powder and other talc-based products cause cancer. Talc and asbestos exposure.

J&J company subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that describes how the company plans to pay different kinds of cancer patients in the bankruptcy settlement. Talc and asbestos exposure. J&J has claimed that its Talc products are safe and do not cause cancer. J&J is seeking a second time to resolve more than 38,000 lawsuits in bankruptcy and stop new cases from being filed in the future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan will pay $400 million into a separate trust for claims made in state courts by attorneys general claiming that J&J was in violation of the state’s unfair commercial practices as well as consumer protection laws, by deceiving consumers about the security of its talc-based products.

Many states had initiated consumer protection measures against J&J before LTL’s first bankruptcy filing stopped these investigations from taking place in 2021. Talc and asbestos exposure. New Mexico and Mississippi had already brought suit with Johnson & Johnson before then as well as the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative subpoenas or demands in LTL’s court papers.

New Mexico and Mississippi have moved to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy in a joint move with cancer victims and The U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. argue that a profit-making company such as J&J does not qualify for bankruptcy protections meant for people with debt problems.
The first time LTL attempted to settle the bankruptcy-related lawsuits was dismissed after similar arguments. In the end, a U.S. appellate court decided that LTL did not have “financial difficulty” and thus not eligible of bankruptcy protection. Talc and asbestos exposure. LTL filed a second bankruptcy just over two hours after the dismissal, arguing the second bankruptcy was different due to the fact that it had less money available and had more support for the possibility of settling.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss that LTL’s new bankruptcy violates state law enforcement powers by seeking to unilaterally limit the liability of the company for state consumer protection laws.

Talc And Asbestos Exposure

The filings of LTL’s latest bankruptcy proceedings also include more details on how the company would evaluate and pay claims for cancer should the bankruptcy plan be approved.

The largest amount of money under the settlement would be $500,000 to those diagnosed with mesothelioma terminal prior to the age of 45, and $260,000 for those who have been diagnosed with cancer of the ovary before age 45.

From there, the proposed settlement offers discounts based on the severity and type of cancer, the patient’s age, previous talc use and other factors. Talc and asbestos exposure. For example an individual who was using talc products weekly, had an ancestral history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed with stage II ovarian cancer when she was 55 may qualify to receive a payment of $21,125 under the program.

Judge decides J&J and talc opponents to discuss settlement negotiations.

Following another hearing in Johnson and Johnson’s efforts to implement a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy for talc litigation and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the firm and the people who opposed the strategy to engage in negotiations to settle the matter, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy bid for LTL management, a subsidiary founded by J&J to handle the claims company offered a settlement amounting to $8.9 billion. Talc and asbestos exposure. While one firm representing plaintiffs support the settlement, a different group is against the settlement.

In the last week, an opposition group, which is known as”the Official Committee of Talc Claimants requested the bankruptcy court to disqualify the petition argument that LTL is not a factor to be in financial trouble.

“The filing is a desperate and legally deficient attempt by a small number of law firms to block claimants from voting on the resolution plan – a plan that the vast majority of claimants support,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in an announcement. Talc and asbestos exposure. “The law firms who filed their filing are financially oriented and have conflicts that are in conflict with, contradict and contravene those which their clientele. We will be submitting an answer to the appellate court.”

Talc and asbestos exposure. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM who boasts more than patients with mesothelioma who have filed lawsuits against J&J, said that J&J’s second bankruptcy effort will fail.

“J&J issue press releases that boast about how amazing the plan is but simultaneously insisting that the plan’s details, including what each sick person will receive–be kept secret,” Thompson said in an announcement. “What is J&J’s plan to conceal?”

4L 4

Kaplan has instructed the sides to come up with another reorganization plan, under the oversight and supervision of mediators.

The court in February of 2022 Kaplan acknowledged J&J’s use of Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would free J&J from the tens of thousands of claims over its talcum products.

In January of this year, an appeals court in the United States overturned the verdict, ruling that the company was not able to be considered in “financial distress.”

The J&J’s plan to contest the U.S. Supreme Court was dismissed on April 1, J&J was granted a second petition for bankruptcy roughly two hours later. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days to decide whether to grant an additional bankruptcy.

J&J’s omnipotent profit engine fails after $6.9B settlement charge for talc.

In the Two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has purchased 19 months of which cases have been on hold. Talc and asbestos exposure. The company is requesting that claimants decide whether they want to accept the settlement. J&J would need 75% of the vote in order for the agreement to be accepted.

In addition to the group of talc lawyers who criticised the company’s bankruptcy, the U.S. Trustee, a branch belonging to the U.S. Department of Justice was also the one to file an appeal to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy case.

In a recent filing, U.S. Trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the bankruptcy are “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” The doors “are not accessible to those that lack a legitimate bankruptcy reason or want to take advantage of the bankruptcy process to hinder or delay their creditors,” Vara continued.

To its credit, J&J maintains there is no definitive evidence to suggest that its products containing talc, such as its iconic baby powder, cause cancer. J&J has taken its products off of the market–first on North America in 2020–and the rest of the world next year.

J&J is determined to stay clear of the costly business of going to court. It has won most of the cases that were decided at trial, but some losses have been severe.
A highly publicized trial in Missouri led to a $4.7 billion verdict against the drugmaker that was later reduced to $2.1 billion after appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
Overall, J&J has lost nine trial cases in talc which are being appealed or resolved. Out of 41 trials 32 have ended in the favor of J&J either through a mistrial or verdict for a plaintiff that was reversed on appeal. Talc and asbestos exposure. Additionally, the company has announced plans to settle over 1000 cases at a cost of $100 million, Bloomberg published at the time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Talc And Asbestos Exposure

Our lawyers handle the baby powder litigation in every state. The talcum powder lawsuits on behalf of Johnson & Johnson have been going on for a long time. Talc and asbestos exposure. The lawsuits allege that prolonged use of talcum powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in many products, including the Baby Powder along with Shower to Shower as well as other products, may cause cancer of the ovary in certain women.

This page gives a J&J talc power litigation update and discusses how the upcoming bankruptcy ruling affects the final settlement amounts of these ovarian cancer lawsuits.

Has the deadline passed for you to bring a talcum lawsuit? Many who assume the statute of limitations has passed to file a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us at 800-553-882 or request a free and quick case review online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Talc And Asbestos Exposure

June 2 2023 Update: At an asbestos talc court trial held that took place in California yesterday, technical issues disrupted the opening statement by the defense lawyers. Talc and asbestos exposure. The jurors, attending from home on Zoom however, heard Johnson & Johnson’s lawyer expressing skepticism about the 70s science asserting the presence of asbestos in their product before the proceedings abruptly ended.

Meanwhile, the plaintiff could present an initial witness Arthur Langer. Langer said that the presence of other minerals in talc is inevitable. He said that his team was notified by J&J in the year 1971 about the presence of chrysotile asbestos within the talc produced by the company, although at less than 0.1 percent. The asbestos was discovered by him in 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update Talc and asbestos exposure. The first trial since J&J has decided to separate its Talc segment and file for bankruptcy marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing talc lawsuit drama. Trial began yesterday in the poignant trial of a young plaintiff, diagnosed with a rare and aggressive type of mesothelioma earlier this year. which lawyers on both sides believe is a tragic loss.

The opening statements exposed the huge differences between the sides’ narrative. The attorney representing the plaintiff aimed his ire at Johnson & Johnson, alleging that the company employed deceitful tactics in research practices and throughout the litigation process. In the words of attorney, Johnson & Johnson attempted to alter the definition of asbestos in spite of internal documents from between 1978 and 1994 that showed asbestos fibers found in tissue of the plaintiffs are included.

Johnson & Johnson’s precarious $8.9 billion settlement proposal hangs in the balance with the progress of this trial. Despite the distinctive nature of this mesothelioma-related case and its unique challenges compared to most talcum powder lawsuits, a verdict favoring the plaintiff could be the company with a major setback in its expectations of widespread acceptance of their settlement proposal among plaintiffs.

May 31st, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson’s bankrupted talc unit has strongly defended its Second Chapter 11 filing in the face of challenges from victims of talc injuries. In a written objection to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the subsidiary argued that the filing differed fundamentally from the first filing. It highlighted the extraordinary commitment of $8.9 billion to J&J as the largest settlement ever in a mass tort bankruptcy case. Talc and asbestos exposure. The issue is not discussed: whether the amount of the settlement implies that it is a fair settlement. J&J also claimed support from numerous plaintiffs’ law companies representing over the 60,000 plaintiffs. This is hard to verify however it is likely to be incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: As of Johnson and Johnson’s bankruptcy filing in 2021 filing, the first trial involving the cosmetic talc products it claims to comprised of asbestos is set to commence jury selection on Monday, California within the Alameda County Superior Court, a historically good location for plaintiffs. The plaintiff claims his mesothelioma is the result of asbestos exposure in J&J’s product, an allegation J&J denies. The trial also involves six retailers who are accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22, 2023 Update: Lawyers involved in the 2nd J&J talc bankruptcy are fighting over who should be chosen to fill the position of the claims representative in the future, which is vitally important to resolving the claim for talc. Talc and asbestos exposure. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who regularly appears in MDLs throughout the United States, was appointed as the claims representative in the initial bankruptcy. J&J’s defense team wants Ellis to be appointed to this position yet again, but the lawyers for the talc plaintiffs are protesting on the grounds that Ellis has an interest conflict which should stop her from holding that position in the future. The issue stems from the issue that Ellis was involved in drafting the hotly disputable second bankruptcy, which raises doubts regarding her capacity to remain neutral. It’s true that this bankruptcy will likely to be dismissed regardless.

May 17th, 2023 Update: The pretend company J&J made up for the talc litigation bankruptcy has informed an New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have set aside $400 million to settle claims made by states accusing the company of misleading advertising for its talc product. Talc and asbestos exposure. That’s an $8.5 billion settlement for cancer sufferers. It is hard to imagine a scenario where J&J will be able to push the settlements of baby powder through in these figures. While J&J’s $8.5 billion offer seems like a huge sum at first, it does not appear appealing when you do the math. The proposed settlement based on our rough calculations would not be able to pay victims more than $100,000 per case. It’s not enough.

May 15th 2023, Update J&J is potentially facing a lawsuit brought by an advocacy group that represents cancer victims. Talc and asbestos exposure. The group claims that J&J intentionally withdrew an $61.5 billion financing agreement with its subsidiary, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial distress and validate the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group claims this decision could be interpreted as a fraudulent transfer of rights of compensation for victims. They will investigate J&J’s actions after the announcement of the decision to dismiss LTL’s first bankruptcy suit.

May 10 2023 Update: Next week next week, it is expected that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments on a motion to dismiss the second bankruptcy application from J&J LTL Management, J&J’s subsidiary. LTL Management. However, in the meantime, the bankruptcy has issued an order calling for both parties to participate in a new settlement mediation to see if a global settlement deal can reached.

May 5 2023 Update: Talc producer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to many lawsuits claiming that its talc products caused cancer through asbestos exposure. Talc and asbestos exposure. Over 2,700 individuals have sued the firm and it is spending $1 million a month to defend its legal position. The company’s most recent $29 million verdict on the state of South Carolina forced it to apply for bankruptcy protection and argue for a fair distribution of assets between talc claimants rather than being confiscated from the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have filed for bankruptcy due to litigation.

May 4 2023 Update U.S. bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to reopen talks on settlement with lawyers who have rejected the company’s proposed $8.9 billion settlement offer. It was in Trenton, New Jersey yesterday, the parties appeared in court to discuss next steps for the second bankruptcy case and Judge Kaplan pushed more settlement talks.

This is the answer to resolve the claims of J&J. A baby powder settlement can be made. Talc and asbestos exposure. However, it’ll require more money, more billions of dollars – from Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are divided over whether to accept the proposal and not every client sees the situation the same way their lawyer views it. The second bankruptcy case is bound to fail, with Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing in June to determine if she will discharge the bankruptcy for the 2nd time.

May 3, 2023 Update A group of cancer victims suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) demanded to have the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to halt litigation over talc products. The group representing claimants for talc filed a motion on Tuesday requesting for the Third Circuit to consider their case and then send it back an earlier court, with instructions for dismissing the bankruptcy. Talc and asbestos exposure. They also asked that stoppage of tort litigation against J&J continue to proceed.
LTL filed for Chapter 11 protection once again following its bankruptcy filing that was rejected by the Third Circuit earlier this year which offered an $8.9 billion settlement. The committee believes that the recent decision allowing LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 to continue, as well as halting the trials against J&J should be subject to an immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee also asked that an New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s vice president for global litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg saying that J&J intends to file a response in the appeals court, declaring the filing an “desperate and legally flawed attempt” by a select group of law firms with conflicting financial interests.
May 1 2023 Update: One frequently asked question is how the plaintiffs’ lawyers and their clients turn off $8.9 billion. That’s of course an enormous amount of money. But there are a lot of victims. Talc and asbestos exposure. They are a great cases for plaintiffs. We have been reminded of this recently by two talc-related trials that have resulted in huge verdicts for the plaintiffs. In February mesothelioma, a talcum-based powder trial in Oregon ended in an award that was $18.1 million. The following month, a second talc mesothelioma case went to hearing at South Carolina and resulted in the verdict of $29 million in favor of plaintiff. Both cases were defended by Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. which is one of the leading suppliers of talc in the U.S.
April 30th 2023 Update: When J&J first attempted to drag the talcum powder litigation into bankruptcy, it did so with an offer to set aside $2 billion to settle the case. It was a ridiculously small amount. All of the talc plaintiffs agreed with the proposal. However, this time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 in the event that the talc victims will allow a bankruptcy settlement and they also have the backing of a significant part of the talc-related plaintiffs and their lawyers. Talc and asbestos exposure. But 75% of the talc plaintiffs, which is required for bankruptcy plan approval is not an easy task due to the sheer number of lawyers with massive inventory of baby powder litigations opposed in favor of the deal.

What are the solutions to the impasse? More billions.
April 25 2023 update: Talc cancer claimants have asked a judge to disqualify their Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, declaring that the company isn’t financially troubled. LTL requested Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby products caused cancer. Talc and asbestos exposure. LTL was denied Chapter 11 in January. 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January in a ruling that said LTL was not eligible for bankruptcy relief because it had not demonstrated financial difficulties.

The claimants assert that LTL’s third Chapter 11 case is an abuse of the bankruptcy system, and that it is being pursued in bad good faith. J&J claims the bankruptcy settlement is backed by “significant support” from the firms that represent about 60,000 potential claimants. It’s safe to say that lawyers representing plaintiffs and victims ‘ lawyers are not united over the $8.9 billion offer for settlement.

April 21, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge ruled the company Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits claiming that the company sold baby powder that was contaminated and causing cancer. Although the trials for the lawsuits involving talc are delayed for at least 60 calendar days however, new lawsuits may be filed, and lawyers can begin preparing their cases. Talc and asbestos exposure. The judge expressed skepticism over J&J’s absurd attempt to relaunch its strategy in the second bankruptcy case.

April 13, 2023: Update on the big news is the $8.9 billion over 25 years offer for settlement. Lawyers representing cancer victims who are part of MDL class action MDL collective action vowed to fight the settlement alongside Talc claimants. Why? They think it is not enough money for those suffering from cancer who are 70,000. Talc and asbestos exposure. They argue that J&J should negotiate a larger settlement or settle individual claims if the latest bankruptcy is thrown out.

There is a different set of lawyers who are not part of the leadership of group action. They have amassed tens of thousands of cases. They want to settle with what they believe is far less than what these victims deserve. Their argument is two-fold. First, they argue the settlement of around 100,000 dollars per plaintiff is fair.

That is a hard argument to argue. However, their second argument has more force: the victims can not afford to wait any longer and need to get their money right now.

April 12 2023 Update: People are asking how J&J is able to file for bankruptcy once more. The answer is complex and confusing. However, let’s attempt to explain it simply.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only means to deal with both present and future talc lawsuits conclusively. It believes it can pay less in the event of an element of bankruptcy that puts pressure to settle. Talc and asbestos exposure. In a quest to cover the 400-year span of American history, the company believes that bankruptcy is beneficial to all parties as it distributes settlements more equally and effectively than trial courts where some litigants receive significant award while others do not.

The main thrust of this 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case of one that makes a profit, but an affiliate to accept the legal responsibility and declare bankruptcy – something Congress had in mind when it came to drafting the Bankruptcy Code. However, the court also ruled the company was financially trouble because J&J offered unlimited financing.
This is why J&J took advantage of the unlimited funding portion of the deal and didn’t make any promises to offer unlimited funding for lawsuits. The company claims that its updated financing arrangements with its subsidiary address the concerns of the appeals court while providing funds for claims. As if offering victims lower amounts of money would resolve the underlying issue.

Attorneys representing cancer victims who oppose the agreement counter this by arguing that the plaintiff is a defense against legal nonsense by pointing out legal nonsense: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion of assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s ruling. Hyperbole did not go unnoticed by the victims’ lawyers, who call this the biggest “fraudulent deal in United States history.”

Notwithstanding the legal mumbo jumbo, J&J does not really believe this bankruptcy will be able to last. But it is a way to try and push the $8.9 billion settlement and keep the pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10 2023 Update: Bloomberg has an interesting piece on a law that has been passed of New Jersey that is shedding new light on the funding of litigation in the baby powder plaintiffs in the class action. Funders for litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims that were brought against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) concerning talc products in exchange for a percentage of any winnings. J&J has now offered to pay $8.9 billion in settlements for all lawsuits.

The involvement of funders is public information due to an New Jersey court rule requiring the release of certain details regarding outside funding backers. The rule aims to address the rising calls for regulation of the litigation funders. J&J is facing more than 60,000 claims when you include state and federal baby powder lawsuits. Third-party funding for mass tort lawsuits is not without its pros and cons. There is no doubt that we are witnessing how third-party funding could level the playing field between people and large corporations in the courtroom.

April 4 2023 Update: It’s pleasing to see the worm turning in this case. J&J took another hit this week, when an appeals court in the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to continue the automatic stay in the meantime that J&J appeals a bankruptcy ruling before the U.S. Supreme Court. It has frozen thousands of talcum powder cases and stopped any the filing of new lawsuits ever since J&J launched the controversial attempt to spin the talc liabilities into a bankrupt subsidiary over a year ago. Talc and asbestos exposure. After the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was insufficient only a few months back, the stay was revoked. J&J had hoped to have it remain in effect until hearing the SCOTUS appeal. However, the answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The chance is that the Supreme Court is willing even to take up the appeal? Low.
March 16th 2023 Update: With the bankruptcy stay being officially lifted, the very first new cases have been filed and transferred into the class action involving talcum powder MDL in the space of a year. Seven new talc lawsuits were brought into the MDL in the past month which brings the total number of cases that are pending to 37,522.

February 25, 2023 Update The following information is available: A Congressmen from Tennessee is now demanding that The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) initiate an investigation into how much J&J Talc products have cost the government over the many years.
in a letter addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) claimed that J&J of ignoring the dangers of its talc-based products for years while tax dollars were used to treat those who were injured through exposure to the chemicals. The demand comes just weeks after J&J’s major loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Talc and asbestos exposure. J&J has to begin making reasonable settlement proposals to victims to in putting this behind. It is a stain on one of the most prestigious businesses.

February 14 2023 Update: At an appearance today at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention following the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.