You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation What’s bad about talc. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!
J&J’s proposed settlement for talc would be worth 400 million dollars to US state AGs. What’s Bad About Talc .
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has set aside $400 million to settle U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of its broader $8.9 billion deal to settle allegations that its Baby Powder as well as other talc product causes cancer. What’s bad about talc.
J&J company subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that details how the company intends to pay for different types of cancer victims as part of bankruptcy settlement. What’s bad about talc. J&J has declared that its Talc products are safe, and won’t cause cancer. It’s trying for a second time to resolve more than 38,000 lawsuits in bankruptcy, as well as prevent new lawsuits from being filed in the future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plans would deposit $400 million to a separate trust for claims filed by state attorneys general alleging that J&J had violated states’ unfair practices and consumer protection laws, by deceiving consumers regarding the security of its talc-based products.
A number of states had already initiated consumer protection measures against J&J prior to the time that LTL’s bankruptcy filing prevented those investigations from taking place in 2021. What’s bad about talc. New Mexico and Mississippi had already initiated suits with Johnson & Johnson before then as well as the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued subpoenas or civil investigative demands according to court papers.
New Mexico and Mississippi have decided to declare LTL’s bankruptcy unfinished along with cancer sufferers as well as those affected by cancer and the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. have claimed that a lucrative business like J&J is not eligible for bankruptcy protections designed for struggling debtors.
The company’s initial attempt to resolve the bankruptcy lawsuits was dismissed after similar arguments. The U.S. appeals court ruled it was not LTL had not been in “financial difficulty” and therefore not eligible to receive bankruptcy relief. What’s bad about talc. LTL filed a second bankruptcy just over two hours after the dismissal, arguing its second attempt was different in that it was able to borrow less and had a greater chance of securing an agreement.
New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion for dismissal that LTL’s new bankruptcy violates state law enforcement authorities in attempting to unilaterally limit LTL’s liability to state consumer protection actions.
What’s Bad About Talc
LTL’s recent filings also provided more information about how the company would assess and pay cancer claims should the bankruptcy plan be approved.
The largest amount of money under the settlement will be $500,000 for patients diagnosed with mesothelioma that is terminal before age 45 and $260,000 for people diagnosed with cancer of the ovary before age 45.
The proposed settlement provides discounts based on the nature and severity of cancer, the patient’s age, the history of using talc and other factors. What’s bad about talc. For instance the case of a woman who used talc products on a weekly basis, who had an ancestral history of ovarian cancer, and was diagnosed with stage II ovarian cancer by age 55 might qualify for a $21,125 payout according to the plan.
Judge orders J&J and talc oppositionists to take part in settlement talks.
Following another round of hearings in Johnson &Johnson’s attempt to use a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy for talc litigation, federal bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposing the plan to enter into negotiations to settle the matter, Bloomberg reports.
In its second bankruptcy effort for LTL Management, a subsidiary set up by J&J to handle the claims company offered a settlement of $8.9 billion. What’s bad about talc. While a firm representing plaintiffs support the settlement, a different group opposes the deal.
Earlier this week, the opposition group, dubbed the Official Committee of Talc Claimants requested the bankruptcy court to dismiss the case by saying that LTL can not be considered in financial distress.
“The filing is an unjust and legally flawed attempt by a few of law firms to stop claimants from deciding on the resolution plan–a plan the vast and growing majority of claimants approve of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. What’s bad about talc. “The law firms who filed this filing have financial interests that clash with, diverge from, and contravene those which their clientele. We will be submitting a response before the court of appeals.”
What’s bad about talc. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM which boasts more than mesothelioma clients who have filed lawsuits against J&J claimed that the second bankruptcy attempt of J&J failed.
“J&J issues press releases that boast about how amazing its plans are, but is demanding that plan details–including what individuals with illnesses would receive,” Thompson said in a statement. “What is J&J’s plan to cover up?”
Kaplan has instructed both sides to develop a new reorganization plan, under the supervision from two mediators.
The court in February of 2022 Kaplan stated that J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would free the company from the hundreds of thousands of claims over its talcum products.
However, in the month of January, a federal appeals court ruled against the decision, deciding that the company was not able to be considered to be in “financial financial distress.”
When J&J’s attempt to challenge the U.S. Supreme Court was dismissed in April, J&J was granted a second petition for bankruptcy two hours after. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days to decide whether to grant another bankruptcy.
J&J’s unstoppable profit engine goes out of control after $6.9B cost of litigation involving talc.
With the 2 Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has gotten 19 months of which cases were placed in limbo. What’s bad about talc. The company would like claimants to vote on accepting their settlement. J&J would need 75% acceptance for the deal to pass.
In addition to the group of talc lawyers who criticised the bankruptcy of the company in the U.S. Trustee, the U.S. Trustee, an arm that is part of the U.S. Department of Justice has also filed a motion to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy case.
In a recent filing, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the bankruptcy courts are “open to honest, but naive debtors.” The doors “are not accessible to those that lack a legitimate bankruptcy goal or who seek to use the bankruptcy process to delay or hinder their creditors,” Vara continued.
To its credit, J&J maintains there is no proof conclusive that their Talc-based products, such as its iconic baby powder, can cause cancer. J&J has been taking the products of the market–first to be available in North America in 2020–and the rest of the world this year.
J&J seeks to avoid the expense of going to trial. It has prevailed in the majority of the cases decided during trial, however, some losses have been severe.
A high-profile trial in Missouri resulted in an $4.7 billion judgment against the drug manufacturer, which was later reduced to $2.1 billion after appeals.
Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine talc trials that are either appealing or concluded. Out of 41 trials, 32 ended with an outcome for J&J, a mistrial or plaintiff verdicts that were overturned in appeal. What’s bad about talc. Separately, the company in 2020 moved to settle around 1000 cases for $110 million. Bloomberg published at the time.
Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – What’s Bad About Talc
Our lawyers are handling baby powder lawsuits in all 50 states. The lawsuits involving talcum powder against Johnson & Johnson have been ongoing for years. What’s bad about talc. The lawsuits contend that the prolonged use of talcum powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in many products, including the Baby Powder along with Shower to Shower as well as other products, may cause ovarian cancer in some women.
This page offers the J&J update on the talc power litigation and provides an overview of how the upcoming bankruptcy ruling will impact the final settlement amounts of the cases of ovarian cancer.
Is the deadline for you to start a lawsuit against talcum powder? Many people who think the deadline has passed to file a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us today at 800-553-8082 or request a free and quick review of your case online.
Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – What’s Bad About Talc
June 2 2023 Update: At the asbestos talc case at the trial in California yesterday, technical issues interrupted the opening speech of defense attorneys. What’s bad about talc. Jurors who were watching from their homes via Zoom however, heard Johnson &Johnson’s lawyer express doubt about the science of the 70s asserting the presence of asbestos in their product prior to the proceedings abruptly ended.
The plaintiff had the opportunity to present its first expert witness Arthur Langer. Langer said that the presence of additional minerals along with talc is inevitable. He also testified that his team had notified J&J in the year 1971 about the presence of asbestos chrysotile in the talc produced by the company, although in lesser than 0.1 percent. He also uncovered more asbestos in 1976.
June 1st, 2023 Update What’s bad about talc. The first trial since J&J has decided to separate its talc section and declaring bankruptcy is an important point in the ongoing talc litigation story. Trial started on Monday in the harrowing case of a young 24 year-old plaintiff, diagnosed with an aggressive and rare form of mesothelioma in the past year, which lawyers on both sides agree is a tragedy of a different kind.
Opening statements revealed stark differences in each side’s narrative. The attorney for the plaintiff took aim against Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceitful tactics in research practices and throughout the litigation procedure. In the words of attorney Johnson & Johnson attempted to alter the definition of asbestos in spite of internal documents from between 1978 and 1994 that showed asbestos fibers that were found in the plaintiff’s tissue are included.
Johnson & Johnson’s precarious $8.9 billion settlement proposal hangs in the balance with the progress of this trial. Despite the distinct nature of this mesothelioma case and the unique issues it faces compared to other lawsuits involving talcum powder ruling in favor of the plaintiff could result in a serious setback to J&J’s expectations of widespread acceptance of the settlement they have proposed among plaintiffs.
May 31, 2023: Update from Johnson & Johnson’s bankrupt talc unit strongly defended its second Chapter 11 filing in the opposition of injured talc claimants. In a written objection to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the subsidiary argued that the filing was vastly different from the first filing. It emphasized the unprecedented commitment to $8.9 billion in settlement from J&J the largest ever settlement in any bankruptcy case that involves mass tort. What’s bad about talc. It was not mentioned how the magnitude of the settlement implies that it is an equitable settlement. J&J also claimed that it received support from various plaintiffs’ law firms that represent over the 60,000 plaintiffs. This is hard to verify but likely incorrect.
May 24 2023 Update: As of Johnson & Johnson’s bankruptcy in 2021 filing, the very first trial concerning its cosmetic talc items allegedly containing asbestos is set to begin jury selection on Monday in California in Alameda County Superior Court, a historically good location for plaintiffs. Plaintiff claims that mesothelioma was caused by asbestos exposure from J&J’s products and the company has denied. The trial also involves six retailers accused of selling talc products.
May 22nd, 2023 Update: Lawyers in the 2nd J&J Talc bankruptcy are currently disputing who should be chosen to fill the position of future claims representative, a role that is critically important to resolving the talc claims. What’s bad about talc. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who frequently appears in MDLs across the country was appointed the claims representative in the first bankruptcy. J&J’s defense group wants Ellis to be appointed to that role yet again, but the lawyers for the talc plaintiffs have raised objections to the claim that Ellis has a conflict of interest which should stop her from holding that position once more. The issue stems from the issue that Ellis was involved in drafting the controversially disputable second bankruptcy, which raises doubts regarding her capacity to remain neutral. However, the reality is that this bankruptcy could be dismissed regardless.
May 17, 2023 Update The fake company J&J put together for the talc litigation bankruptcy disclosed to the New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have allocated $400 million to pay the claims of states that accuse the company of deceitful advertising for its talc-based products. What’s bad about talc. That’s an $8.5 billion settlement for cancer sufferers. It’s difficult to imagine an eventuality where J&J could push the baby powder settlements given these numbers. While J&J’s $8.5 billion offer might seem like a large sum initially, it will not appear appealing when you do the math. This settlement proposal – by our rough calculations, would not offer victims anything more than $100,000 per case. That’s not enough.
May 15 2023, Update J&J may be in the middle of a suit from an advocacy group that represents cancer victims. What’s bad about talc. The group contends that J&J intentionally canceled an $61.5 billion financing agreement with its subsidiary, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial stress and verify the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group claims this decision is a fraud transfer of the right to compensation for victims. They intend to investigate J&J’s actions as a result of the denial of LTL’s first bankruptcy case.
May 10 2023 Update: Next week next week, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments in a motion dismiss the second bankruptcy application of J&J subsidiary LTL Management. In the meantime, however it has approved an Order which requires both sides to participate in a second settlement mediation in the hope that it will be possible to reach a global settlement agreement been reached.
May 5th 2023 Update: The talc manufacturer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to several lawsuits alleging that its talc products caused cancer from asbestos exposure. What’s bad about talc. Over 2,700 people have sued the company and it is spending $1 million a month to defend its legal position. The company’s recent $29 million verdict in South Carolina forced it to pursue bankruptcy protection, and arguing that assets should be distributed in an equitable manner between the claimants of talc instead of being taken through the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have declared bankruptcy because of the litigation.
May 4, 2023 update: U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to reopen talks with lawyers who turned down the proposed $8.9 billion settlement offer. The court in Trenton, New Jersey yesterday, the parties appeared in court to discuss the next steps to take in the second bankruptcy case and Judge Kaplan encouraged further settlement talks.
This is the best way to settle these claims with J&J. A settlement for baby powder can be made. What’s bad about talc. But it will require more money – billions of dollars by Johnson & Johnson.
Lawyers are divided over whether to take the proposal or not and not every client sees the situation the same way their attorney does. This second case of bankruptcy is likely to go nowhere with Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing in June to decide if he will dismiss the bankruptcy for the second time.
May 3, 2023 Update: A group representing cancer patients who have sued Johnson & Johnson (J&J) requested for the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to halt the litigation involving talc products. The group representing the claimants filed a motion on Tuesday requesting the Third Circuit to consider their case and to send it back an earlier court, with instructions for dismissing the bankruptcy. What’s bad about talc. The committee also requested that the stopped tort litigation against J&J be allowed to proceed.
LTL filed for Chapter 11 protection once again after its first bankruptcy filing was denied by the Third Circuit earlier this year and offered the possibility of an $8.9 billion payment. The committee argues that the recent ruling which allowed LTL’s third Chapter 11 to continue, while also halting trials against J&J and J&J, requires the immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee has also requested the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s worldwide vice president of litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg declaring that J&J plans to file a statement in the appeals court declaring the filing an “desperate and legally deficient plan” by a handful of law firms who have different financial interests.
May 1 2023 Update: One common question that people ask is how plaintiffs and their attorneys turn on $8.9 billion. Of course, that is an enormous amount of money. But there are plenty of victims. What’s bad about talc. They are a great arguments for plaintiffs. We have been reminded of this recently with two talc trials led to huge verdicts for plaintiffs. In February mesothelioma cases, a talcum powder trial in Oregon led to a verdict of $18.1 million. A month later, another mesothelioma trial involving talc was held for trials at South Carolina and resulted in a verdict of $29million on behalf of the plaintiff. It was the same defendant as in these cases: Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. One of the largest suppliers of talc in the U.S.
April 30, 2023 Update: When J&J initially attempted to pull the litigation over talcum powder into bankruptcy, they came with the option of putting aside $2 billion to settle the case. This was an absurdly low amount. The talc plaintiffs had not believed in the proposal. This time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 If the talc plaintiffs will allow a bankruptcy settlement and they have the support of a large part of the talc-related plaintiffs as well as their lawyers. What’s bad about talc. However, 75% of plaintiffs who are a talc, which is required for bankruptcy plan approval, it a tough road because of the number of lawyers who have huge inventory of baby powder lawsuits opposed to the settlement.
What are the solutions to the impasse? More billions.
April 25 2023 update: Talc Cancer victims have requested a judge to disqualify their Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a ridiculously made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, which claims that the business is not financially distressed. LTL filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby products caused cancer. What’s bad about talc. It was the 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January, saying the company wasn’t eligible for bankruptcy relief since it was unable to demonstrate financial distress.
The plaintiffs argue that the third Chapter 11 case is an abuse of the bankruptcy system, and that it is being pursued in bad faith. J&J states that the bankruptcy settlement has “significant backing” from the firms that represent around 60,000 plaintiffs. It is fair to say plaintiffs’ lawyers and victims ‘ lawyers are divided on this $8.9 billion offer for settlement.
April 21, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge ruled that Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that it offered a baby powder with a contaminant that caused cancer. Even though trials for the talc lawsuits have been suspended for at least 60 calendar days however, new lawsuits may be filed, and lawyers may begin to prepare their cases. What’s bad about talc. Judges expressed doubt about J&J’s absurd attempt to revive its plan with another bankruptcy case.
April 13th 2023: Update on the most important story is that there’s an $8.9 billion over the course of 25 years offer for settlement. Lawyers representing cancer patients in MDL class action MDL Class Action have vowed to fight the settlement alongside those who claim talc. Why? They think it is not enough to pay for 70,000 victims who have cancer. What’s bad about talc. These lawyers believe that J&J could negotiate a greater settlement or litigate individual claims if the latest bankruptcy is thrown out.
But there’s a separate group of lawyers outside of the leadership group in the class action. The lawyers collectively have accumulated many thousands of cases. They want to settle today in what many believe to be less than these victims deserve. The argument they make is two-fold. First, they argue that the settlement – about an average of $100,000 per plaintiff is fair.
This is an argument that is difficult to present. But their second argument has more teeth: victims can not afford to wait any longer and need to get their money right now.
April 12 2023 Update: Many are asking how J&J could file for bankruptcy once more. The answer is complicated and confusing. But let’s try to explain it in simple terms.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only means to resolve both current and future talc-related lawsuits definitively. Also, it believes that it will be less expensive when there is an element of bankruptcy that puts pressure for a settlement. What’s bad about talc. Moving past 400 years of American history, the firm believes that bankruptcy is beneficial to all parties as it distributes settlement payments more equitably and effectively than trial courts, where litigants are awarded significant settlements while others get nothing.
The gist in the 3rd Circuit decision was this isn’t a case that involves a profitable company making an affiliate to accept the legal risk and declare bankruptcy – Congress thought of when drafting its Bankruptcy Code. However, it also stated it was not in financial crisis because J&J assured it of unlimited funding.
So J&J did not hesitate to take advantage of the unlimited funding part of the holding and didn’t make any promises to offer unlimited funding for lawsuits. The company claims that revised financing arrangements with its subsidiary will address concerns of the appellate court, while offering claim payment funds. As if offering victims lower amounts of money would resolve the problem at hand.
Attorneys representing cancer patients who do not agree with the agreement counter this by arguing that the plaintiff is countering legal nonsense with legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets to LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s previous decision. Hyperbole was not spared the lawyers representing victims call it the largest “fraudulent transaction that has occurred in United States history.”
Notwithstanding the legal mumbo jumbo, J&J does not really think this bankruptcy will survive. But it is a way of pushing this $8.9 billion settlement, and to keep pressure on plaintiffs.
April 10 2023 update: Bloomberg has an interesting article about a new law within New Jersey that is shedding new light on the funding of litigation in the plaintiffs in the class action. Litigation funders Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims in the case of Johnson & Johnson (J&J) concerning talc products in exchange for a percentage of any profits. J&J is now offering that it will pay $8.9 billion in settlements for all lawsuits.
The involvement of the funders is public information due to a New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information about outside funding backers. The rule aims to address the rising calls for regulation of the litigation funders. J&J faces over 60,000 claims when you combine state and federal infant powder litigation. Third-party funding of mass tort cases has both pros and pros and. But there is no question that we are witnessing how third-party funding can level the playing field between people and large corporations in court.
April 4 2023 Update: It is pleasing to see the worm turn in this legal battle. J&J was hit again this week when the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to maintain the automatic stay as J&J appeals an order granting bankruptcy at the U.S. Supreme Court. This automatic stay halted thousands of talcum powder cases and stopped any new lawsuits from getting filed ever since J&J began the controversial plan to spin the talc liability off into a bankrupt entity over a year ago. What’s bad about talc. After it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not valid only a few months back, the stay was revoked. J&J had hoped to have it continue in the meantime of its SCOTUS appeal. The answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The likelihood that of the Supreme Court is willing even to hear the appeal? Low.
March 16, 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay now fully lifted, the first new cases were filed and incorporated into the talcum powder class action MDL in the space of a year. Seven new talc lawsuits have been joined to the MDL over the last month increasing the number of pending cases up to 37,522.
February 25, 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee is now requesting that authorities from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) start an investigation into the amount J&J product containing talc has cost the government over the decades.
In a recent letter to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) accused J&J of failing to recognize the dangers of its talc products for decades while tax dollars were spent treating those injured by exposure to the product. The lawsuit comes just a few weeks following J&J’s dramatic loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.
What’s bad about talc. J&J must begin making reasonable settlements to victims to getting this behind. It’s a mark on one of the top businesses.
February 14 2023 Update: At the hearing held today at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention to follow the ruling of 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.
You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation What’s bad about talc. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!
.jpg "Whats Bad About Talc - Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit? 2")