National Toxicology Program Genital Use Of Talc Cancer – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed settlement with talc would provide the sum of $400 million US state AGs. National Toxicology Program Genital Use Of Talc Cancer .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put aside $400 million to settle U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of its broad $8.9 billion plan to settle allegations that its Baby Powder and other talc-based products cause cancer. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer.

J&J affiliate LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday which outlines how the company intends to pay different types of cancer victims as part of a bankruptcy settlement. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. J&J has stated that its talc products are safe and don’t cause cancer. It’s trying for an additional time to conclude more than 38,000 lawsuits brought in bankruptcy, as well as prevent new lawsuits from coming forward in the future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan will pay $400 million to an additional trust to settle lawsuits filed by state attorneys general claiming that J&J did not comply with states’ unfair practices and consumer protection laws through misleading consumers about the dangers of its talc products.

Some states had started consumer protection measures against J&J prior to the time that LTL’s bankruptcy filing stopped these investigations from proceeding in 2021. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. New Mexico and Mississippi had already filed suit in the past against Johnson & Johnson before then and states like Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued subpoenas or civil investigative demands in LTL’s court filings.

 

 

New Mexico and Mississippi have moved to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy along with cancer sufferers as well as those affected by cancer and the U.S. Justice Department’s watchdog on bankruptcy, who have argued that a profitable company like J&J cannot benefit from bankruptcy protections meant for struggling debtors.
LTL’s first attempt at resolving the bankruptcy lawsuits was dismissed after similar arguments. In the end, a U.S. appellate court decided in favor of LTL was not in “financial financial distress” and therefore not eligible of bankruptcy protection. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. LTL made a new bankruptcy application just over two hours after that dismissal, arguing that its second attempt was different as there was less money available and more support for an agreement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss LTL’s renewed bankruptcy violates the law enforcement powers of the state by seeking to unilaterally limit the liability of the company in state consumer protection laws.

 

National Toxicology Program Genital Use Of Talc Cancer

LTL’s new filings also included more details on how the company would evaluate and pay cancer claims if the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The most significant payments under the settlement would be $500,000 for people diagnosed with cancer of the mesothelioma ovary before the age of 45, and $260,000 for people diagnosed with terminal ovarian cancer before age 45.

The proposed settlement applies discounts depending on the type and severity of cancer, an individual’s age, the history of using talc and other factors. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. For instance, a woman who used the talc product on a regular basis, had the family history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed the stage 2 ovarian cancer when she was 55 may be eligible for a $21,125 payment according to the plan.

Judge ordains J&J, talc opponents to participate in settlement talks.

Following another hearing in Johnson & Johnson’s effort to use a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to settle talc lawsuits, federal bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposed to the strategy to engage in negotiations to settle the matter, Bloomberg reports.

The second time it attempted to file for bankruptcy for LTL Management–a subsidiary established by J&J to hold the claims–the company offered a settlement amounting to $8.9 billion. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. While a firm representing plaintiffs is in favor of the deal, another group opposes the move.

In the last week, an opposition group, which is known as”the Official Committee of Talc Claimants and urging the bankruptcy court to dismiss this case by argument that LTL can not be considered in financial distress.

“The filing is an unjust and legally flawed attempt by a small number of law firms to try to prevent claimants from voting on the resolution plan–a plan the vast and growing majority of claimants are in favor of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. “The law firms who filed the filing are pursuing financial interests which are in conflict with, diverge from, and are in opposition to the interests of their clients. We’ll be submitting an appeal an appeal to the appellate court.”

National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM, which has more than 80 patients with mesothelioma who have sued J&J, said that J&J’s second bankruptcy attempt failed.

“J&J publishes press release about how great the plan is but simultaneously insisting that the plan’s details, including what the individual sick individuals would receive — be kept private,” Thompson said in the statement. “What is J&J’s plan to conceal?”

 

 

Kaplan has commanded the parties to come up with another strategy for reorganization, under the oversight and supervision of mediators.

On February 20, 2022 Kaplan affirmed the ability of J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would free J&J from the thousands of lawsuits related to its talcum-based products.

However, in January of this year, a federal appeals court overturned the decision, ruling that the company could not be considered to be in “financial financial distress.”

In the event that J&J’s request to challenge the U.S. Supreme Court was dismissed at the end of April J&J was granted a second petition for bankruptcy two hours after. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 calendar days to decide whether or not to approve the second bankruptcy.

J&J’s unstoppable profit engine sputters after $6.9B the talc litigation cost.

Through Two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has gotten 19 months of which the cases were on hold. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. The company wants claimants to decide whether they want to accept the settlement. J&J would need 75% approval for the settlement to be approved.

In addition to the group of talc lawyers that criticized the bankruptcy of the company in the U.S. Trustee, the U.S. Trustee, an arm of the U.S. Department of Justice has also filed a motion to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy.

In a statement this week, U.S. Trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the doors of bankruptcy are “open to honest, but naive debtors.” Those doors “are not accessible to those that do not have a legitimate purpose or that seek to use bankruptcy to hinder or delay their creditors.” Vara continued.

On the other hand, J&J maintains there is no evidence conclusive that its talc products, including its popular baby powder cause cancer. J&J has taken the products of the market first in North America in 2020–and the rest of the world this year.

J&J wants to avoid the cost of going to court. The company has won the majority of cases that were decided through trial, though certain losses have been punishing.
A highly publicized trial in Missouri ended in an $4.7 billion verdict against the drug company and was later lowered to $2.1 billion following appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine trial involving talc that are appealing or concluded. Out of 41 trials 32 have resulted in winning for J&J or a mistrial, or verdict of a plaintiff dismissed on appeal. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. Separately, the company in 2020 moved to settle around 1,000 cases worth the sum of $100 million. Bloomberg reported at the time.

 

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – National Toxicology Program Genital Use Of Talc Cancer

Our lawyers handle the baby powder litigation in every state. The lawsuits involving talcum powder in the case of Johnson & Johnson have been ongoing for many years. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. The lawsuits contend that the prolonged use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in products such as baby Powder as well as Shower to Shower, can cause cancer of the ovary in certain women.

This page provides an J&J Talc Power Update and explains how the forthcoming bankruptcy ruling affects the final settlement amounts of these ovarian cancer lawsuits.

Did the deadline expire for you to file a talcum powder lawsuit? Many who believe that the statute of limitations has run out to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us at 800-553-882 or request a no-cost and quick review of your case online.

 

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – National Toxicology Program Genital Use Of Talc Cancer

June 2, 2023 Update: During an asbestos talc court trial held in California yesterday, technical issues disrupted the opening statement by the defense attorneys. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. Jurors watching from home on Zoom however, heard Johnson &Johnson’s lawyer express skepticism about the 70s science asserting the presence of asbestos in their product before the opening was abruptly ended.

In the meantime, the plaintiff was able to present their first witness, Arthur Langer. Langer explained that the occurrence of other minerals in talc is expected. He said that his team was notified by J&J in the year 1971 about the presence of chrysotile asbestos the talc produced by the company, although in just 0.1 percent. The asbestos was discovered by him in 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. This is the first court trial that has taken place since J&J made the decision to split its Talc division, and then declare bankrupt is an important point for the ongoing litigation story. Trial began yesterday in the poignant trial of a young plaintiff who was diagnosed with an extremely rare and aggressive form of mesothelioma in the past year, which both sides of the argument agree is a harrowing tragedy.

Opening statements revealed huge differences between the sides’ narrative. The attorney for the plaintiff took aim against Johnson & Johnson, alleging that the company employed deceitful strategies in its research practices as well as throughout the litigation process. In the words of attorney the company attempted to manipulate the definition of asbestos in spite of internal documents dating from the year 1978 and 1994 indicating that asbestos fibers in the tissue of the plaintiff are included.

Johnson & Johnson’s precarious $8.9 billion settlement offer hangs in the balance as we progress of this trial. Despite the distinctive nature of this mesothelioma case and its distinctive issues in comparison to the majority of talcum powder lawsuits, a verdict favoring the plaintiff could cause an enormous setback for J&J’s hope of gaining broad acceptance for their proposed settlement among plaintiffs.

May 31 2023: Update from Johnson & Johnson’s bankrupt talc business is defending their two-time Chapter 11 filing in the opposition of the talc injury plaintiffs. In an appeal to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the company argued that the case differed fundamentally from the previous filing. It emphasized the unprecedented commitment to $8.9 billion in settlement from J&J as the largest ever settlement in any bankruptcy case that involves mass tort. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. The issue is not discussed: whether the amount of the settlement implies that it is a fair settlement. J&J also claimed that it received support from various plaintiffs’ law firms representing more than sixty thousand claimants. This is hard to verify but likely incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: In the wake of Johnson and Johnson’s bankruptcy filing in 2021 filing, the very first trial involving its cosmetic talc products that are believed to containing asbestos is set to start jury selection on Monday, May 24, California at Alameda County Superior Court, a historically good location for plaintiffs. The plaintiff asserts that his mesothelioma resulted from asbestos exposure resulting from J&J’s products and J&J does not deny. The trial also includes six retailers accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update Lawyers in the 2nd J&J talc bankruptcy are fighting over who should be chosen to fill the role of a future claims representative, which is vitally critical to resolving Talc claims. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who regularly appears in MDLs across the country was appointed the claims representative in the previous bankruptcy. J&J’s defense group wants Ellis to be appointed to this position yet again, but the lawyers for the talc plaintiffs have raised objections to the claim that Ellis has a conflict of interest which would prohibit her from assuming that position once more. The dispute stems from fact that Ellis was involved in drafting the hotly contesting second bankruptcy, raising doubts about her capability to remain neutral. It’s true that this bankruptcy could get dismissed anyway.

May 17, 2023 Update The fake company J&J created for the talc litigation bankruptcy has informed the New Jersey bankruptcy court that they had allocated $400 million to settle the claims brought by states accusing the company of deceitful advertising for its talc products. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. So that makes it an $8.5 billion settlement to cancer victims. It’s difficult to imagine a scenario where J&J could push these settlements for babies with these numbers. Although J&J’s $8.5 billion offer may seem like a lot initially, it does not look great when you look at the numbers. This settlement proposal – by our rough calculations – would not provide victims with much more than a median settlement of $100,000 per instance. That’s not enough.

May 15th 2023 Update J&J could be facing lawsuit brought by an advocacy group representing cancer patients. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. The group claims J&J deliberately withdrew an $61.5 billion financing agreement in conjunction with its affiliate, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial stress and confirm the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group argues that this act could be interpreted as a fraudulent transfer of the victims’ compensation rights. They are planning to study J&J’s actions after the announcement of the decision to dismiss LTL’s first bankruptcy case.

May 10 2023 Update: The following week in it is expected that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments on a motion to reject the second bankruptcy filing that was filed by J&J LTL Management, J&J’s subsidiary. LTL Management. In the meantime, however it has approved an Order that requires both parties to take part in a settlement mediation hoping that it will be possible to reach a global settlement agreement come to fruition.

May 5 2023: Update on Talc provider Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to many lawsuits claiming that its talc products caused cancer from asbestos exposure. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. More than 2700 people have filed lawsuits against the firm, and it was paying $1 million per month to defend its legal position. The company’s latest $29 million verdict on the state of South Carolina forced it to apply for bankruptcy protection and argue for a fair distribution of assets among talc claimants instead of being taken over through the receiver. Other talc suppliers have also filed for bankruptcy due to the litigation.

May 4 2023, Update U.S. The bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to resume talks with lawyers who turned down the company’s $8.9 billion agreement. In Trenton, New Jersey yesterday, the parties appeared before a judge to discuss next steps in the second bankruptcy case. Judge Kaplan encouraged further settlement talks.

This is the answer to settle these claims for J&J. A baby powder settlement can be made. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. But it’ll need more money, more billions of dollars by Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers have a split opinion on whether or not to accept the plan and not every client sees the issue in the same manner their attorney does. Second bankruptcy cases are bound to be a failure and Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing in June to decide if he will dismiss the bankruptcy for the second time.

May 3, 2023 Update: A group representing cancer patients who have sued Johnson & Johnson (J&J) requested for they request that the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to halt litigation over talc products. The group of talc claimants filed a motion on Tuesday, asking for the Third Circuit to consider their appeal and return the case before a court of lower jurisdiction with instructions to discharge the bankruptcy. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. They also asked that the stoppage of tort litigation against J&J be allowed to continue.
LTL applied for Chapter 11 protection once again after its bankruptcy filing was denied by the Third Circuit earlier this year with the possibility of an $8.9 billion settlement. The committee says that the recent ruling, which allows the second Chapter 11 to continue, as well as halting the trials against J&J and J&J, requires urgent Third Circuit review. The US Trustee also asked that be the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s worldwide vice president of litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg declaring that J&J plans to file a formal response to the appeals court saying that the filing is a “desperate and legally deficient move” by a few of law firms who have conflicting financial interests.
May 1, 2023 Update: One question people keep asking is how could plaintiffs and their lawyers turn off $8.9 billion. That’s of course an immense amount of money. However, there are lots of victims. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. And these are really good cases for plaintiffs. We were reminded recently by two talc-related trials that resulted in big verdicts for plaintiffs. In February, a talcum powder mesothelioma trial in Oregon led to a verdict in the amount of $18.1 million. A month later, another mesothelioma talc case was brought to the court on the other side of South Carolina and resulted in an award of $29 million to the plaintiff. In both instances, the defendant was Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc., one of the most prominent suppliers of talc in the U.S.
April 30th, 2023 Update: When J&J first tried to bring the lawsuit over talcum powder into bankruptcy, they came with an offer to set aside $2 billion to settle the case. The amount was absurdly low. There was no one among the talc victims who supported the offer. However, this time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 for talc-related plaintiffs if they will allow a bankruptcy settlement and they also have the support of a substantial part of the talc-related plaintiffs and their lawyers. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. But 75% of the plaintiffs who are a talc, which is needed for approval of the bankruptcy plan, it a tough road since there are so many lawyers with huge stocks of baby powder lawsuits that are opposed to the settlement.

What are the solutions to the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023 Update Talc plaintiffs have requested a judge to reject the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a ridiculously made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, which claims that the business is not financially distressed. LTL has filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby powders cause cancer. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. LTL was denied Chapter 11 in January. 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January and said that the company wasn’t eligible for bankruptcy relief since it had not demonstrated financial difficulties.

The plaintiffs argue that LTL’s second Chapter 11 case is an abuse of the bankruptcy system, and that it’s being conducted in bad good faith. J&J claims the bankruptcy settlement is backed by “significant backing” from firms representing about 60,000 potential claimants. It’s fair to say plaintiffs’ lawyers and the victims are split over their disagreement over the $8.9 billion offer for settlement.

April 21, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge ruled in favor of Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits claiming that the company sold a baby powder that contained a chemical that causes cancer. Even though trials for the talc lawsuits have been suspended for at least 60 calendar days, new lawsuits can be filed and lawyers can begin preparing their cases. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. The judge expressed his doubts about J&J’s attempt to revive its strategy by filing the second bankruptcy case.

April 13th 2023 update: the big story is that there’s an $8.9 billion over the course of 25 years settlement offer. Lawyers representing cancer victims involved in MDL class action MDL collective action pledged to fight the settlement alongside Talc claimants. Why? They feel it’s not enough for 70,000 victims who have cancer. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. They argue that J&J should negotiate a bigger settlement or settle individuals’ claims if the current bankruptcy is dismissed.

But there’s a separate group of lawyers outside of the leadership of that class action. They have amassed many thousands of cases. They want to settle the case now for what is believed to be less than the victims deserve. Their argument appears to be twofold. They argue that the settlement – which amounts to an average of $100,000 per plaintiff – is fair.

It’s a difficult argument to make. But their second argument has more force: the victims can now not wait and they want their money now.

April 12 2023 Update: Many are wondering if J&J can go through bankruptcy again. The answer is complicated and complicated. But let’s try to explain the issue in a simple way.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only means to resolve both current and future talc lawsuits conclusively. That is, it thinks it will pay less when there is a bankruptcy component that applies pressure for a settlement. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. Going back to hundreds of years of American history, the firm claims that bankruptcy benefits all parties by distributing settlements more fairly and more efficiently than trial courts which are where litigants get significant award while others do not.

The essence in this 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case of a profitable company making subsidiaries to meet the legal risk and declare bankruptcy Congress thought of when drafting its Bankruptcy Code. It also clarified that the entity was in financial distress due to the fact that J&J promises unlimited funding.
Thus, J&J did not hesitate to take advantage of the unlimited funding aspect of the contract and didn’t make any promises to fund unlimited lawsuits. The company says that its revised financing arrangements with its subsidiary address concerns of the appellate court, while supplying funds for claim payments. As if offering victims lower amounts of money would resolve the underlying issue.

Lawyers representing cancer patients who do not agree with the agreement counter this with what you conclude is countering legal nonsense with legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion of assets from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s previous decision. Hyperbole did not go unnoticed the lawyers representing victims call it the largest “fraudulent deal of assets in United States history.”

Despite all the legal jargon, J&J does not really believe that this bankruptcy will last. But it’s a way to try and push the $8.9 billion settlement to keep pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10, 2023, Update Bloomberg is running an intriguing article on a new law that has been passed in New Jersey that is shedding new light on the funding of litigation in the suit for class actions. Litigation funders Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) over talc products in exchange in exchange for a portion of profits. J&J has now offered an offer of $8.9 billion in settlements for all lawsuits.

The involvement of funders is made public due to the New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information regarding outside funding backers. The rules aim to address the rising calls for the regulation of lawsuit funders. J&J has to deal with more than 60,000 lawsuits when you include federal and state Baby Powder lawsuits. Third-party funding in mass tort claims is not without its pros and cons. But there is no question that we are seeing how third-party financing can help level the playing field between people and big corporations in court.

April 4, 2023 Update: It is enjoyable to see the worm turn in this lawsuit. J&J has taken another blow this week when the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to extend the automatic stay while J&J appeals a bankruptcy decision in the U.S. Supreme Court. Automatic stays have stopped thousands of talcum cases and stopped the filing of new lawsuits ever since J&J initiated the controversial effort to spin talc-related liabilities into a bankrupt subsidiary more than one year in the past. National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. After it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not valid a few months ago, the stay was revoked. J&J wanted to see it remain in effect until hearing the SCOTUS appeal. The answer was no.
April 1, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. There is a chance that the Supreme Court is willing even to consider the appeal? Low.
March 16, 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay officially lifted, the first new cases were filed and incorporated into the class action for talcum powder MDL in just over a year. Seven new talc cases were joined to the MDL over the last month which brings the total number of pending cases up to 37,522.

February 25 2023 Update This morning, a Congressmen from Tennessee is now demanding that authorities from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) begin an investigation to determine how much J&J product containing talc has cost the government in the many years.
in a letter addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) accused J&J of not recognizing the risks of its talc products over long while tax dollars spent treating those injured by exposure to the product. This lawsuit comes a few weeks following J&J’s dramatic loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. J&J must begin making reasonable settlement proposals to victims, in order the process of putting all this behind it. It’s a mark on one of the top firms.

February 14 2023 Update: At a hearing today in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention to follow the ruling of 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.

 

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation National toxicology program genital use of talc cancer. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

 

  • Free Illinois Divorce Forms Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Is Talc Bad For The Skin – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Is Online Divorce Legal In New Jersey – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Online Dating After Divorce Articles – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Lawsuit Against Talcum Powder – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • How To File For Divorce Online In Michigan – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Fda Bid For Asbestos In Talc Analysis 2009 – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • How Can I File For Divorce Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Get A Divorce Online Va – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Online Filing Divorce Papers – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  •  

  • Terms of Use
  • Finding A Good Divorce Lawyer
  • Free Do It Yourself Divorce Forms
  • Disclosure
  • About
  •  

    >>> National Toxicology Program Genital Use Of Talc Cancer

    You May Also Like