Pioneer 2882 Talc And Asbestos – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed talc settlement will be worth $400 million to US state AGs. Pioneer 2882 Talc And Asbestos .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has set aside $400 million to settle U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of its broader $8.9 billion settlement of allegations that its Baby Powder and other talc items cause cancer. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos.

J&J subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that describes how the company intends to pay for different types of cancer victims in a bankruptcy settlement. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. J&J has claimed that its talc products are safe and do not cause cancer. J&J is seeking another time to settle more than 38,000 lawsuits brought in bankruptcy and prevent new cases from coming forward in the future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan would pay $400 million into an additional trust to settle claims brought from state attorney generals claiming that J&J was in violation of laws against unfair business practices in the State of New York as well as consumer protection laws by misinforming consumers about the security of its talc-based products.

Many states had initiated consumer protection actions against J&J prior to the time that LTL’s bankruptcy filing prevented these investigations from progressing in 2021. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. New Mexico and Mississippi had already filed actions in the past against Johnson & Johnson before then as well as the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued subpoenas or civil investigative demands, according to LTL’s court filings.

 

 

New Mexico and Mississippi have moved to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy as well as cancer patients as well as those affected by cancer and the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. have claimed that a lucrative company like J&J does not qualify for bankruptcy protections aimed at people with debt problems.
LTL’s first attempt at resolving the bankruptcy cases was dismissed after similar arguments. In the end, a U.S. appellate court ruled in favor of LTL had not been in “financial trouble” and therefore not eligible of bankruptcy protection. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. LTL had filed for bankruptcy again just over two hours after the dismissal, saying that its second attempt was different in that it had less money available and had a greater chance of securing the possibility of settling.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss that LTL’s renewed bankruptcy violates the state’s law enforcement authority by seeking to unilaterally limit the liability of the company for state consumer protection laws.

 

Pioneer 2882 Talc And Asbestos

LTL’s filings for the new year also contained more details on how the company would assess and pay for cancer claims in the event that the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The highest payments under the settlement will be $500,000 for those diagnosed with mesothelioma terminal prior to the age of 45, and $260,000 for those diagnosed with terminal ovarian cancer prior to age 45.

The proposed settlement applies discounts depending on the severity and type of cancer, an individual’s age, previous using talc and other factors. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. For example someone who regularly used the talc product on a regular basis, had an ancestral history of ovarian cancer, and was diagnosed with the stage 2 ovarian cancer at the age of 55 could be in line for a $21,125 payout under the program.

Judge ordains J&J and talc opponents engage in settlement talks.

Following another round of hearings in Johnson & Johnson’s effort to implement a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy for talc litigation and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposing the plan to enter into talks to reach a settlement, Bloomberg reports.

The second time it attempted to file for bankruptcy for LTL management, a subsidiary founded by J&J to manage the claims company offered a settlement amounting to $8.9 billion. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. While a firm representing plaintiffs is in favor of the offer, another group is against the settlement.

This week, the opposition group, dubbed”The Official Committee of Talc Claimants and urging the bankruptcy court to dismiss the case by asserting that LTL can not be considered in financial distress.

“The filing is a desperate and legally ineffective attempt by a handful of law firms to try to prevent claimants from voting on the resolution, which the vast majority of claimants favor,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. “The law firms that are behind the filing are pursuing financial interests which clash with, contradict and are in opposition to the interests that their customers. We’ll submit an answer in the appeals court.”

Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM, which is home to more than mesothelioma patients who have sued J&J for bankruptcy, told J&J’s second bankruptcy attempt will fail.

“J&J sends out press releases that boast about how amazing its plans are, but is insisting that the details of its plan–including the treatment individual sick people would actually be treated to,” Thompson said in an email. “What do they have to keep secret?”

 

talcum powder lawsuit payout

 

Kaplan has directed the parties to create a strategy for reorganization, under the supervision of two mediators.

The court in February of 2022 Kaplan stated that J&J’s use of Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would release J&J from the hundreds of thousands of claims concerning its talcum products.

In the month of January, an appeals court of the federal government overturned the decision, ruling that the business could not be considered to be in “financial financial distress.”

After J&J’s contest the U.S. Supreme Court was turned down on April 1, J&J applied for its first bankruptcy two hours later. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days, allowing the company to decide whether to grant the second bankruptcy.

J&J’s omnipotent profit engine fails after $6.9B the talc litigation cost.

With Two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has bought 19 months during which cases have been held. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. J&J wants the claimants to vote on accepting their settlement. J&J requires 75% support in order for the agreement to be accepted.

In addition to the team of talc lawyers who panned the bankruptcy of the company as well, the U.S. Trustee, a branch from the U.S. Department of Justice has also filed motions to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy second case.

In a letter filed this week, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the bankruptcy courts are “open to honest, but naive debtors.” Those doors “are not open to parties that do not have a legitimate objective or seek to use the bankruptcy process to hinder or delay their creditors,” Vara continued.

In its own words, J&J maintains there is no definitive evidence to suggest that its Talc-based products, such as its popular baby powder can cause cancer. J&J has been taking the products of the market, first for North America in 2020–and the rest of the world this year.

J&J wants to avoid the expense of going to trial. J&J has won the majority of the cases that have been decided through trial, though some losses have been severe.
A highly publicized trial in Missouri produced a $4.7 billion verdict against the drugmaker that was later reduced to $2.1 billion after appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine cases involving talc, which are being appealed or resolved. Of the 41 trials, 32 have ended in an outcome for J&J, a mistrial or verdict of a plaintiff reversed on appeal. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. The company also in 2020 moved to settle around 1000 cases for 100 million dollars, Bloomberg announced at that time.

 

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Pioneer 2882 Talc And Asbestos

Our lawyers are handling baby powder cases in all 50 states. The lawsuits involving talcum powder in the case of Johnson & Johnson have been in the process for several years. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. The lawsuits contend that the prolonged use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in products such as baby Powder and Shower to Shower and Shower to Shower, could cause ovarian cancer in certain women.

This page provides a J&J Talc Power litigation update and provides an overview of how the upcoming bankruptcy ruling will affect the final settlement amount in the ovarian cancer lawsuits.

Has the deadline passed for you to bring a talcum lawsuit? Many who believe the statute of limitations has run out to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us today at 800-553-8082 or request a free and quick review of your case online.

 

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Pioneer 2882 Talc And Asbestos

June 2 2023 Update: In the trial for asbestos-containing talc that took place in California yesterday, some technical issues disrupted the opening statements of the defense lawyers. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. Jurors who were watching from home via Zoom and hearing the Johnson and Johnson’s lawyer express doubt about the science of the 70s claiming asbestos was present in their product prior to the session abruptly ended.

In the meantime, the plaintiff had the opportunity to present the first of their witnesses, Arthur Langer. Langer said that the presence of other minerals in talc is expected. He said that his team had notified J&J in the year 1971 of the presence of asbestos chrysotile in the company’s talc, albeit in lesser than 0.1 percent. He also uncovered more asbestos in 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update: Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. The first trial since J&J decided to spin off its talc division, and then declare bankrupt marks an important turning point for the ongoing litigation controversy. Trial began yesterday in the harrowing trial of a young plaintiff who was diagnosed with an extremely rare and aggressive form of mesothelioma last year. which both sides acknowledge is a tragedy of a different kind.

The opening statements exposed the sharp differences in the two sides’ story. The plaintiff’s attorney took aim at Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceitful strategies in its research practices as well as throughout the litigation process. The attorney claims that, according to Johnson & Johnson attempted to alter the definition of asbestos in spite of internal documents dating from 1998 and 1994 that show asbestos fibers that were found in the tissue of the plaintiff are included.

Johnson &J’s tangled $8.9 billion settlement is hanging in the balance as we progression of this trial. Despite the particularity of the mesothelioma trial and its distinctive issues in comparison to most talcum powder lawsuits, a verdict favoring the plaintiff could be an enormous setback for J&J’s expectations of widespread acceptance of their proposed settlement among plaintiffs.

May 31st, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson’s bankrupt talc business vigorously defended their two-time Chapter 11 filing in the in the face of challenges from injured talc claimants. In a written objection to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the company argued that the situation was distinct from the prior filing. It emphasized the unprecedented commitment to $8.9 billion from J&J the biggest settlement ever to be made in an bankruptcy case involving mass torts. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. It was not mentioned how the magnitude of the settlement signifies that it’s a fair settlement. J&J also claimed that it received support from a variety of plaintiffs’ law firms representing more than sixty thousand claimants. This is not easy to confirm but likely incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: As of Johnson & Johnson’s 2021 bankruptcy filing, the very first trial on its cosmetic talc products that are believed to comprised of asbestos is set to start jury selection on Monday, California in Alameda County Superior Court, an historically reliable jurisdiction for plaintiffs. The plaintiff claims his mesothelioma was triggered by asbestos exposure resulting from J&J’s products, an allegation the company has denied. The trial also includes six retailers accused of selling talc products.

May 22, 2023 Update: Lawyers in the 2nd J&J Talc bankruptcy are fighting over who should be chosen to fill the post of future claims representative, a role that is critically important to resolving the Talc claims. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who regularly appears in MDLs all over the nation, was appointed as the claims representative in the initial bankruptcy. J&J’s defense team would like Ellis to be appointed in that position and again, but attorneys for the plaintiffs in talc are arguing due to the fact that Ellis has an interest conflict which should stop her from being appointed to that post for the second time. The issue stems from the fact that Ellis was believed to have been involved in the creation of the hotly contested second bankruptcy, which raises doubts about her capability to remain neutral. In reality, the bankruptcy will be dismissed regardless.

May 17, 2023 Update: The pretend company that J&J put together for the talc litigation bankruptcy has informed the New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have allocated $400 million to pay the claims of states that accuse the company of misleading advertising for its talc product. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. This amounts to an $8.5 billion settlement for cancer sufferers. It is hard to imagine the scenario in which J&J can push the settlements of baby powder through with these numbers. Although J&J’s $8.5 billion offer may seem like a large sum initially, it does not look great after you calculate the figures. This settlement offer based on our rough calculations would not provide victims with much more than a median settlement of $100,000 per case. That is not enough.

May 15th 2023 update: J&J is potentially facing a lawsuit brought by an advocacy group that represents cancer victims. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. The group argues that J&J deliberately withdrew a $61.5 billion fund-raising agreement that it had with its company subsidiary LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial stress and validate the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group claims this decision is a fraud transfer of victims’ compensation rights. They will investigate J&J’s actions following of the denial of LTL’s first bankruptcy case.

May 10 2023 Update: During the next week this week, this week the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments in a motion dismiss the second bankruptcy petition filed of J&J subsidiary LTL Management. In the meantime the bankruptcy has issued an order that requires both parties to participate in a new settlement mediation in the hope that a global settlement deal can brokered.

May 5th 2023: Update on Talc manufacturer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to several lawsuits alleging that its talc products caused cancer through asbestos exposure. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. Over 2,700 people have sued the company and it has been paying $1 million per month on legal defense. The company’s recent $29 million settlement at the Supreme Court of South Carolina forced it to pursue bankruptcy protection, and arguing that assets should be distributed in an equitable manner between the claimants of talc instead of being confiscated through the receiver. Other talc suppliers have also declared bankruptcy because of lawsuits.

May 4 2023 update: U.S. The bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to reopen talks with lawyers who have rejected Johnson & Johnson’s $8.9 billion settlement offer. In Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties appeared before a judge to discuss the next steps in their second bankruptcy matter and Judge Kaplan encouraged further settlement talks.

This is the best way to resolve the claims of J&J. The baby powder settlement is likely to be achieved. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. But it will require more money – billions of dollars – coming from Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are split on whether or not to agree with the proposal and not every client views the issue the same way their lawyer does. The second bankruptcy case is expected to go nowhere and Judge Kaplan has set a date for a hearing in June to determine whether to discharge the bankruptcy for the 2nd time.

May 3, 2023 Update A group of cancer victims suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) demanded that they request that the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it attempts to block litigation regarding talc-related products. The group representing the claimants has filed a motion this week, asking the Third Circuit to consider their case and to send it back the lower court with instructions to dismiss the bankruptcy. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. They also asked that lawsuit against the halted torts of J&J allow the litigation to proceed.
LTL has filed for Chapter 11 protection once again following the bankruptcy filing it made earlier was rejected in the Third Circuit earlier this year, offering the possibility of an $8.9 billion settlement. The committee argues that the recent decision allowing the second Chapter 11 to continue, in addition to halting trials against J&J and J&J, requires urgent Third Circuit review. The US Trustee has also requested an New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s vice president for global litigation, Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg saying that J&J intends to file a reply in the appeals court, characterizing the filing as a “desperate and legally insufficient move” by a small number of law firms who have conflicting financial interests.
May 1 2023 Update: One frequently asked question is how the plaintiffs’ lawyers and their clients turn off $8.9 billion. Of course, that’s a lot of money. There are a lot of victims. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. And these are really good cases for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this recently in two talc trials which have resulted in huge verdicts for the plaintiffs. In February mesothelioma, a talcum-based powder trial in Oregon ended in the verdict worth $18.1 million. In the same month, a different mesothelioma-related talc case went to hearing in South Carolina and resulted in a verdict of $29 million in favor of plaintiff. The defendant in both cases was Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. one of the largest producers of talc in the U.S.
April 30th 2023 Update: J&J initially attempted to pull the talcum powder litigation into bankruptcy, it was met with an offer to put aside $2 billion for settlements. It was a ridiculously small amount. The talc plaintiffs had not were in favor of the proposal. This time around, however, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 If the talc plaintiffs are willing to accept bankruptcy settlements and they also have the backing of a significant part of the talc-related plaintiffs and their lawyers. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. But with 75% of plaintiffs of talc are required to approve bankruptcy plans is a difficult road due to the sheer number of lawyers with huge inventory of baby powder lawsuits opposed to the settlement.

What is the solution to this impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023 update: Talc patients have requested a judge to reject the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly fabricated Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, insisting that the company is not financially distressed. LTL applied for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby powders caused cancer. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. It was the 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January and said that the company was not eligible to receive bankruptcy relief because it did not show financial difficulties.

The claimants argue that LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 case is an misuse of the bankruptcy system and it is being pursued in bad faith. J&J states that the bankruptcy settlement has “significant support” from the firms that represent around 60,000 plaintiffs. It’s safe to say that the plaintiffs’ attorneys and victims are divided over their disagreement over the $8.9 billion amount of settlement offered.

April 21st, 2023 Update A bankruptcy judge has ruled that Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that the firm sold a baby powder that contained a chemical that causes cancer. Even though trials for talc lawsuits are paused for at least 60 days and new lawsuits are able to be filed, and lawyers can begin preparing their cases. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. Judges expressed doubt about J&J’s pathetic attempt to revive its plan with a second bankruptcy trial.

April 13th, 2023 update: the biggest announcement is an $8.9 billion over the next 25 years offer for settlement. Lawyers representing cancer victims in the MDL group action pledged to challenge the settlement Talc claimants. Why? They think it is not enough money for 70,000 victims who have cancer. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. These lawyers believe that J&J should negotiate a larger settlement or litigate individuals’ claims if the current bankruptcy is thrown out.

But there is another group of lawyers outside of the leadership of the class action. These lawyers have collectively amassed the equivalent of tens of thousands of lawsuits. The group is seeking to settle today in what many believe to be less than these victims deserve. Their argument is twofold. First, they argue the settlement, which is about 100 million dollars on average per plaintiff – is fair.

That is a hard argument to prove. But their second argument has more force: victims should no longer wait and want the money immediately.

April 12 2023 Update: People are wondering if J&J can file for bankruptcy again. The answer is complicated and complicated. But let’s try to explain the issue in a simple way.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only method to settle both present and future talc litigations in a definitive manner. It believes that it will be less expensive when there is an element of bankruptcy that puts pressure to settle. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. In a quest to cover the 400-year span of American history, the company argues that bankruptcy benefits all parties as it distributes settlements more fairly and effectively than trial courts where some litigants receive significant settlements while others get nothing.

The basic tenet of this 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case of the profit-making company that has an affiliate to accept the legal burden and declare bankruptcy, which is what Congress considered when it was drafting the Bankruptcy Code. However, it also stated the company was in financial crisis because J&J promised unlimited funding.
This is why J&J decided to go with the unlimited funding part of the contract but did not pledge that it would provide unlimited funds for litigation. The company says that its revised financing arrangements with its subsidiary will address concerns of the appeals court while offering claim payment funds. It’s as if giving victims lesser money could solve the problem at hand.

Lawyers representing cancer patients who oppose the deal counter this by arguing that the plaintiff is countering legal nonsense legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion of assets from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s previous decision. Hyperbole was not spared: victims’ lawyers call it the biggest “fraudulent transaction in United States history.”

Notwithstanding the legal mumbo jumbo, J&J does not really think that the bankruptcy will endure. But it is a way of trying to push this $8.9 billion settlement to keep pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10 2023, Update Bloomberg is running an intriguing piece on a law that has been passed of New Jersey that is shedding new light on the funding of litigation in the class action lawsuit. Funders for litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of lawsuits that were brought against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) regarding talc products, in exchange in exchange for a portion of winnings. J&J is now willing to pay $8.9 billion to settle any lawsuits.

The funders’ involvement is publicly available due to an New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information about outside funding backers. The law is designed to respond to the increasing calls for regulation of the litigation funders. J&J has to deal with more than 60,000 lawsuits when you add up federal and state Baby Powder lawsuits. Third-party funding in mass tort claims has both pros and cons. However, there is no doubt that we are seeing the ways that third-party funding can even the playing field between individuals and big corporations in court.

April 4, 2023 Update: It’s fun to watch the worm turn in this lawsuit. J&J suffered another setback this week, when the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to maintain the automatic stay in the meantime that J&J appeals a bankruptcy ruling in the U.S. Supreme Court. The automatic stay has frozen hundreds of cases involving talcum powder and stopped any new lawsuits from getting filed ever since J&J launched the controversial attempt to spin the talc debts into a bankrupt company over one year back. Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. After it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was invalid a few months ago, the stay was removed. J&J was hoping to have it continued pending its SCOTUS appeal. But the answer was no.
April 1, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. There is a chance that for the Supreme Court is willing even to hear the appeal? Low.
March 16 2023 Update: With the bankruptcy stay having been officially lifted, the very first new cases have been filed and transferred into the class action involving talcum powder MDL in over one year. Seven new talc-related lawsuits were brought into the MDL in the last month, bringing the total number of cases that are pending to 37,522.

February 25 2023 Update 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee is now demanding that authorities from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) initiate an investigation into how much J&J product containing talc has cost the government over the years.
in a letter addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) claimed that J&J of ignoring the dangers of its talc products over long while tax dollars spent on treating people who suffered injuries from exposure to the product. The suit comes just a few days following J&J’s dramatic loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. J&J needs to start making reasonable settlements to victims to begin in putting this behind. This is a disgrace to one of the greatest firms.

February 14 , 2023 Update: At the hearing held today in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention to follow the third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.

 

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Pioneer 2882 talc and asbestos. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

 

  • Can You View Divorce Records Online? – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Arizona File For Divorce Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Divorce Papers Online For Illinois – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Splitting Up The Home In A Divorce In Florida Even If One Partner’s Name Is Not On The Deed – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Johnson & Johnson Sunscreen Lawsuit – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Pennsylvania Divorce Online Search – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Talc Face Powder Cancer – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Seminole Public Divorce Records Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Obtain New York County Divorce Decree Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Johnson & Johnson Gynemesh Ps Lawsuit – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  •  

  • Finding A Good Divorce Lawyer
  • Free Do It Yourself Divorce Forms
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  •  

    >>> Pioneer 2882 Talc And Asbestos

    You May Also Like